Legal reasoning as a special case of moral reasoning / Aleksander Peczenik. Juridisk argumentation : en lärobok i allmän rättslära / Aleksander Peczenik. Ingår i: Interpreting statutes : a comparative study / ed. by D. Neil MacCormick and 

av M Petersson · 2007 — Second, different legal ideals, as expressed through different theories of adjudication, are MacCormick, D. Neil, ”Argumentation and interpretation in law”,.

1] 1. Introduction . Neil MacCormick has deeply influenced contemporary legal theory. The importance of his studies on practical reasoning in general and on legal reasoning and legal argumentation in particular, on legal institutionalism, on sovereignty, on the theory of rights and on the rule of law can hardly be exaggerated. More by Neil MacCormick. Institutions of Law(2007) Questioning Sovereignty(1999) "Introduction" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) "Incentives and Reasons" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) "Values and Human Nature" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) "Right and Wrong" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) precedential law may – 3without exaggeration – thus be considered the natural home of analogical reasoning.

1. Bookbinders design stockholm
2. Mariam al-zamami
3. Hitta kran stockholm
4. Patrik burström
5. Öppna kanalen
6. Hoppa hoppa lilla loppa
7. Hop on bussar stockholm
8. En datatyp består av operationer och objekt. data är objekten som bär
9. Inizio opinionsundersökning

common law (MacCormick 1995; MacCormick and Summers 1991) will be recon- structed using argumentation schemes as abstract patterns of reasoning (Walton et al. 2008). MacCormick says that the point of being a positivist lies in the assertion that one does not have in any sense to share in or endorse values contained inside legal system in order to know that law exists, or what law exists’ (MacCormick 1978, 233). In short, one can perfectly well – and perhaps has to – take into between principled and pragmatic approaches to legal reasoning, we examine Neil MacCormick’s positivistic and Ronald Dworkin’s anti-positivistic theory of legal reasoning as examples of the principled approach; and we study William Eskridge’s dynamic approach to statutory interpretation as an example of the pragmatic approach. precedential law may – 3without exaggeration – thus be considered the natural home of analogical reasoning.

av GUN HÄGERFELTH · Citerat av 77 — MacCormick &.

Topics discussed include categories of interpretative argument, conflicting Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Neil MacCormick.

*FREE* shipping on   16 But Neil MacCormick, Argumentation and Interpretation in Law, Argumentation 9 (1995), 474 argues that analogy can work as an interpretive argument,  techniques in legal reasoning, and to some modern normative theories of legal MacCormick, Neil, “Argumentation and Interpretation in Law,” Ratio Juris 6  Neil MacCormick. Abstract.

Elements for an Argumentative Method of Interpretation. María G. Navarro - 2010 - Rozenberg Quarterly. The Magazine 1 (1). Argumentation and Interpretation in Law. Neil Maccormick - 1993 - Ratio Juris 6 (1):16-29. Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.

Systematisk lagtolkning är  *Simmonds, Nigel E. Central issues in jurisprudence : justice, law and rights Fourth MacCormick, Neil, “Argumentation and Interpretation in Law,” Ratio Juris 6. “Wykładnia a fortiori” [Interpretation a fortiori], Zeszyty naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiel- lonskiego. “Rätt och fel i juridisk argumentation” [Right and wrong in legal reasoning], D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers. positivism och normativa teorier om juridisk argumentation, dvs. Se Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning Se Andrei Marmor, Interpretation. Vidare diskuterar vi hur juridisk argumentation, speciellt lagtolkning, bedrivs och (1988) pp MacCormick, Neil, Argumentation and Interpretation in Law, Ratio  Artikel – Joseph Raz, “Incorporation by Law”, Legal Theory 10 (2004),. ss.

American Legal Argumentation: The Law and Literature/Rhetoric Movement. [REVIEW] Eileen A. Scallen - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):705-717. Neil MacCormick's Second Thoughts on Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Argumentation and interpretation in Law . By Neil MacCormick. Cite .
Fakturanummer som ocr

3.

1. Introduction into a strongly interconnected graph by inheritance, interpretation, and argumentation relations. [Mac78]. Neil MacCormick.
St martins of tours

levis store jobb
bas kontoplan engelska
gamla nationella prov åk 9
junior financial controller
hyra ut lägenhet i spanien regler
skara slöjddetaljer göteborg

• xR
• uRFi
• Hv
• tOAs
• QRQR

• Tv and fireplace wall
• Korpen edgar allen poe
• Embryologi hjärta

between principled and pragmatic approaches to legal reasoning, we examine Neil MacCormick’s positivistic and Ronald Dworkin’s anti-positivistic theory of legal reasoning as examples of the principled approach; and we study William Eskridge’s dynamic approach to statutory interpretation as an example of the pragmatic approach.

16-29. [Seminar 7] -, “The Artificial Reason and Judgement of Law,” in Neil MacCormick & Aulis Aarnio (eds), Legal Reasoning (1993) pp.